Storinum Resolve · for energy asset investors
Your contracts are signed.
Where are the risks
today?
Most energy assets are procured without an independent risk review. Resolve reads your signed contracts against what actually happened and maps exactly what is still open.
What changes
Contract risk becomes visible before it becomes expensive.
What you get
One structured report, prioritised by urgency and impact.
Typical scope
Warranties, claims, obligations, and the operational gaps that sit between them.
For assets procured without Storinum
The same analysis.
After the fact.
Whether you used Storinum at procurement or not, once the asset is running the same questions apply. Which warranties have conditions that are not being met. Which obligations have no owner. Which claim windows are already closing. Resolve does that analysis once, against your actual contracts.
Storinum Procurements
Before you sign
Independent risk review before contracts are executed. Gaps identified, protections negotiated, CAPEX reduced.
→ Warranty terms reviewed before they are locked in
→ LD structure tested for enforceability
→ Post-COD responsibilities mapped before COD
→ TCO modelled before it becomes a surprise
Storinum Resolve
After you signed
For assets already running. One-time analysis of your contracts against current reality: what is open, what is closing, what you need to do.
→ Which warranty rights require action now to remain enforceable
→ Which post-COD obligations have no named owner
→ Which claim windows are still open and for how long
→ Where TCO is higher than the model and whose cost it actually is
Where risk hides post-contract
Three categories.
All addressable.
Post-contract risk is not about what broke. It is about what was promised but not delivered, what is owed but not claimed, and what you were required to do but did not. None of it requires site visits or live data. It lives in the contracts and the gap between what they say and what is happening.
Promised, not protected
Warranties that exist on paper but cannot be claimed without documentation that does not exist. Guarantee commitments made in negotiation but absent from the executed agreement. Responsibility assignments that no one is fulfilling. The contract looks complete, the protection is not.
Contractual
Owed, not claimed
Warranty value you are entitled to but have not pursued because the baseline was never established, the claim window was missed, or no one had the process to trigger it. Costs that belong to a counterparty but have quietly defaulted to you. Replacement capex that is certain but absent from every model.
Financial / time-sensitive
Required, not done
Your own obligations going unmet: annual maintenance documentation that voids warranty if absent, notification procedures never set up, regulatory conditions buried in permit approvals, grid code compliance no one is filing. Counterparties owe you nothing when your side of the contract is not held.
Obligations / regulatory
From real assets
What we find.
These are not hypothetical. They are the findings that appear consistently across energy assets 6 months to 5 years post-COD.
Tracker warranty / PV
Warranty covers parts. Labour, crane, and technician are owner cost from day one.
Standard tracker supply contracts cover component replacement only. All disassembly, mobilisation, and installation costs fall to the owner, a permanent OPEX item that was not in the original budget. Typical exposure: EUR 10-15k/year on a mid-size PV park.
→ Unbudgeted OPEX identified
Performance baseline / BESS
14 months of SCADA data. No one extracted it. The warranty baseline does not exist.
The manufacturer's degradation guarantee requires a documented commissioning baseline to be enforceable. Without it, any future claim can be disputed. The data exists, it simply has no owner and has never been read. The claim window is closing.
→ Warranty enforcement gap identified
Retained capacity / BESS
≥70% at year 10 was agreed in negotiation. It is not in the signed contract.
The commitment was made verbally and referenced in pre-contract correspondence, but the executed agreement contains no explicit retained capacity figure. Without a written commitment, the 25-year guarantee structure is not enforceable. One letter to the OEM resolves it, if sent now.
→ Written commitment gap identified
Responsibility matrix / PV
Nine post-COD obligations. None of them have a named owner.
The EPC contract and O&M agreement both exist. Neither defines who is responsible for monthly yield reporting, annual thermographic inspection, or curtailment event logging. These obligations default to the owner by silence, and without the data they generate, warranty claims cannot be substantiated.
→ Accountability gaps identified
The output
One report.
Everything open.
A single structured report. No ongoing engagement required. Delivered in 1 week from document receipt.
Promised vs actual
What the contracts commit to versus what is documented as delivered. Every material gap identified and explained.
Warranty enforceability register
Which protections are enforceable today, which require immediate action, and which have already lapsed. Claim windows mapped to calendar.
Responsibility matrix
Every post-COD obligation mapped to a named party. Gaps where no party is assigned. Cost implications of each unowned obligation.
Owner action list
Prioritised by urgency and financial impact. Each action names the counterparty, the contractual basis, and the consequence of inaction.
The process
How it works.
No site visits.
No site visits. No live data connections. Entirely document-based.
Send the documents
EPC agreement, supply contracts, O&M, warranties, whatever you have. We work from what exists.
First analysis
We read everything against the contractual commitments. Gaps identified, quantified, and mapped to responsible parties.
Clarify together
We come back with specific questions, context that only you can provide. No guesswork on our side, no over-explaining on yours.
Report in 1 week
Findings in Storinum's structured format. Prioritised owner action list, warranty register, responsibility map.
Who this is for
Built for the investor,
not the operator.
Resolve is designed for the person who made the investment decision, not the person managing day-to-day operations.
This is for you if
→ You own or manage renewable energy assets, solar, BESS, wind, and are not in an operational role on any of them
→ Your assets are 6 months to 5 years post-COD, past the delivery phase, before most warranty periods expire
→ You receive regular O&M and technical reports but have no independent view of whether what was contracted is being delivered
→ You are considering a refinancing, sale, or portfolio expansion and want to understand your actual risk position first
This is not for you if
- You are the EPC contractor or O&M operator on the asset
- You are in pre-development or procurement phase, that is what Storinum Procurements is for
- You are looking for ongoing performance monitoring or a continuous reporting service
- Your assets are less than 6 months post-COD, the post-COD picture is not yet formed
Start here
Start with one asset.
Know what you own.
Send us the contracts for one energy asset. We analyse, ask what we need to clarify, and deliver findings in 1 week.
one asset / documents in / report in 1 week / no site visit